If your document details personal information about your competitors employees and their personal contact details then I think the situation might be comparable.
From what I recall (the article is register-walled now), the document had twitter handles and public statements. Did the article specify they gathered nonpublic information?
You think having a document detailing competitors is the same thing as compiling personal information of people who have publicly commented against what you're doing?
when i'm doing large presentations to prospective clients my company gives me what they call a "look book". This is a deck with information about every person in the audience all the way down to personality traits, triggering words/phrases, and negotiating style. I think it's pretty normal.
That's a personal information database and making one without consent of the people detailed is _super_ illegal in Europe.
There's a few examples of entities like Jehovah's witnesses making do-not-visit lists that have been considered as a personal information database and such have been in hot water many, many times about that.
Yes, even though you might do them to help you personally, you're acting as an agent of the org you're associated with, and such you're not supposed to be doing that.
> when i'm doing large presentations to prospective clients my company gives me what they call a "look book". This is a deck with information about every person in the audience all the way down to personality traits, triggering words/phrases, and negotiating style. I think it's pretty normal.
this is antisocial manipulative behavior normalized under the auspices of "good business".
Are the potential clients aware that you have this? Are you willing to say who you are or who your company is or would that be embarrassing? I would absolutely not be your client.
sorry to the rest of the esteemed hn community for the low-effort reply, but... gross.