Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If your computer has any kind of secure boot / boot chain attestation stuff going on, like all phones do now, rebooting clears out pretty much all malware. Software bugs can put the system in to a bad state which can be abused by malware, but none of it can persist through a reboot since everything is checked and measured from scratch during the boot.


> any kind of secure boot / boot chain attestation [...] rebooting clears out pretty much all malware

IMHO "pretty much" understates the risk.

Malware can easily install itself as a system service, timer unit, XDG autostart or your shell profile among other places. I'll be the first to admit I never check all these places regularly.

The only thing that should be putting minds at ease is regular OS installs from fresh images.

Resist the temptation to do an "in place" upgrade and go with a clean ISO each time your distro comes out with a new major version.

It's a pain but thanks to configuration management or even shell scripts it's manageable for me now.

Admittedly six months is probably too long as well but at least it stops something lurking on a server or my desktop for years.


If you go with an immutable OS like Fedora Silverblue or Bazzite, every single update is a clean ISO install. And then in your user only install things through Flatpak while checking there aren't dangerous permissions enabled you will be much better off than a normal linux setup were mutations can be placed all over the place in a way that is impossible to audit or secure.


Not for $HOME and ~/.profile and such.


With flatpak, every app would have it's own virtual home to store config files, and for editing documents they can use the portals feature to allow the user to open files without having full filesystem access.


This feels rather overstated. Your firmware check isn't going to tell you if a repo package installed/updated by your package manager got compromised, which is apparently increasingly common.


It's more relevant on ios/Android where you can't through normal means install malware at the system level. Linux is moving in this direction with immutable OSs and better secure boot support but there isn't an easy way to have a secure linux desktop setup currently.


On phones malware is more restrained by the sandboxing. But now the reboot isn't necessary in the first place.


Exploits break out of the sandbox for higher system access. Rebooting flushes them out because the exploits have abused some memory bug to load custom code in the system, but this can not persist a reboot since everything gets cyrptographically verified on boot.

This is why things like the Nintendo Switch hacks and iphone jailbreaks have to be reloaded every time the system reboots, while they could modify the system files to try to persist the malicious code, it would simply leave the device unbootable since the boot chain attestation process would refuse to boot when the checksum doesn't match. The malware can only come back when the initial bug has been triggered again, through receiving a malicious text message attachment for example.


> This is why things like the Nintendo Switch hacks and iphone jailbreaks have to be reloaded every time the system reboots,

Why is it this particular form of 'malware protection' always seems to involve a 30% fee?


It doesn’t. You get exactly the same protections on Graphine OS with Fdroid. It’s just difficult to retroactively sandbox applications on the desktop because it’s a breaking change.

Mobile platforms just got a clean slate to implement a new security model.


If I remember correctly the Pegasus spyware worked only until a reboot and then the attacker had to reinfect the phone again.


Most methods of persisting state have absolutely nothing whatosoever with kernel or modules which are a powerful way to hide malicious activity but far from the only way to persist state including malicious state. The only sane response to being infected with malicious software is to reinstall everything starting with the OS and scan user files AFTER reinstalling.

It is possible even plausible that you can disinfect many sorts of malware from inside a compromised machine but it is inherently less trustworthy and installing from scratch barely takes any more time.


If you know for sure you have been infected with malware then it’s better to reinstall. But on iOS/Android and any other OS with strong boot chain security you can proactively reboot your device periodically and wipe out malware you weren’t aware of.

It’s borderline impossible to persist malware across reboots on iOS these days.


The topic is computers which is normally casually this means PCs, laptops desktops and other form factors none of which share this character.


> Software bugs can put the system in to a bad state which can be abused by malware, but none of it can persist through a reboot since everything is checked and measured from scratch during the boot.

This does not account for supply chain attacks nor trojan attacks which seek consensual installation. A reboot will not eradicate these threat vectors.


It relies on your software to be properly sandboxed and permissioned.

What we have seen is state funded hacking groups can often exploit bugs which break out of sandboxes and embed themselves in the system. But the malicious code only exists in memory, it can’t persist between reboots because the next boot would fail the checksum and signature checks.

Which is why security focused OSs will periodically reboot themselves to flush out possible malware and why jailbreaks and hacks for phones and game consoles usually have to be reinitiated after every boot.

MacOS has a few measures including SIP and boot chain security to implement this, though it’s currently hard to set up a properly secure Linux desktop.


> It relies on your software to be properly sandboxed and permissioned.

And organizations rely on their employees not falling for phishing email. How well has that worked?

> What we have seen is state funded hacking groups can often exploit bugs which break out of sandboxes and embed themselves in the system. But the malicious code only exists in memory, it can’t persist between reboots because the next boot would fail the checksum and signature checks.

"Malicious code existing only in memory" is patently false by not addressing supply chain attacks previously mentioned. To wit, the npm left-pad attack[0]. See also the thousands of PHP CVEs.

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npm_left-pad_incident


This is true, which is why it's extremely hard to create a secure linux desktop today. But things are moving in the right direction, if you use Wayland + Flatpak on a immutable OS with secureboot set up you are in a much better position than a standard distro.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: