Based only on the third quote (you're literally in the thread discussing second iteration of it), and your username, you can't possibly be acting in good faith here, so I'm not going to waste my time providing references to the events that were widely discussed even here on HN in the past 6 months.

> you're literally in the thread discussing second iteration of it

Did you read the thread before posting this? Half of the thread is about how two bits of information used specifically for abuse prevention are objectively not malware - not that it's necessary to point that out to someone with a functioning brain.

> and your username

Profiling - tell-tale sign of someone too stupid to engage in debate and/or who has zero valid points to contribute.

> I'm not going to waste

Yeah, that fools people below the age of...six? Literally everyone else knows that's just how children desperately try to cover for a lack of ability to provide evidence. "Oh, yeah, my dad owns Epic Games, but because you don't believe me, I'm not going to let you meet him!"

I love triggering the OpenAI shills on HN. It's so trivially easy.

Thank you for creating an indelible record for future HN readers about how every single one of your points is completely unfounded and you're merely a propaganda account. Please continue to respond if you just want to provide further evidence of that.