Hacker Times
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
petesergeant
21 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keep...
isn't that true for humans too?
Shitty-kitty
21 days ago
[–]
Humans are more likely to make small mistakes but the internal consistency check is pretty good at catching large errors. On top of that, fudging numbers to make everything add up is not something humans do (not unintentionally at least)
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch!
Applications
are open till July 27.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: