Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I stopped after Malloreon more because my interests changed. Finding out their history hasn’t changed anything for me. But Marion Zimmerman Bradley for some reason has and I have no desire to read any of her books ever again.


I stopped reading Eddings because after a while I realized that all of these fun, bantering characters I so enjoyed were (except for Garion, mostly) truly awful people and that I didn't want to spend any more time with them. That was after I'd re-read them many times, and long before any revelations about the author. (Really, Polgara? Your reaction to being balked is to smash everything in sight? You haven't matured at all in your vastly long life?)

As for MZB, I agree completely. No desire at all.

WRT to O'Brian, though--it's clear, as the OP notes, that he knew his faults, recognizes them in his characters, particularly Maturin, and shows them for what they are. To put it another way, his faults don't "poison" his books from within.


Silk was always a bad person, but had the best dialog.

In the Sparhawk series, Faran was the likeable character.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: