I'm sick of AI slop, and decided to do something about it.
Even with Fable I'm still seeing wrong but plausible answers, which are the worst kind imo.
AGENTS.md didn't quite give me the right boost either, so here's my flow:
1. Asking 2 new sessions to review what I built in my other session along with guides/standards*
2. Having a third session judge the first two. It dedupes, and does a good job of only surfacing the important stuff
3. Ask it to make edits, etc.
Some missing parts that I've been finding improve review are:
- current/past session context
- indexed codebase
- PRs/git history
- research/guides/3rd party context*
I had been running this on my own for a long time, and just started to turn it into a product.
It's free right now, would love any feedback (roast me). Looking forward to catching some bugs for you guys.
Even with Fable I'm still seeing wrong but plausible answers, which are the worst kind imo.
AGENTS.md didn't quite give me the right boost either, so here's my flow:
1. Asking 2 new sessions to review what I built in my other session along with guides/standards* 2. Having a third session judge the first two. It dedupes, and does a good job of only surfacing the important stuff 3. Ask it to make edits, etc.
Some missing parts that I've been finding improve review are: - current/past session context - indexed codebase - PRs/git history - research/guides/3rd party context*
I had been running this on my own for a long time, and just started to turn it into a product. It's free right now, would love any feedback (roast me). Looking forward to catching some bugs for you guys.
https://gx.run
Thanks for reading!
* OWASP, Google Code Review, etc