Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

that is not the case. It is not about effort: The court has ruled that single point of time monitoring is fine, but continuous monitoring (a covertly placed gps tracker, e.g.) is a violation of privacy.


Neither of you are correct.

It's about how costly (in time, energy, money) is it to build how complete of a picture based on what level of prior suspicion?


Needing more people directly translates to needing more energy and money and to having less complete picture. So reducing it to the simple "how much a single person can do" is very useful I'd say.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: