I would assume they actually moved off of litestream here no? otherwise how can ... | Hacker News

Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

why-el 23 days ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Tracking down the 16-year-old WAL-reset SQLite bug

I would assume they actually moved off of litestream here no? otherwise how can their frequent manual checkpointing even succeed when litestream locks for the same behavior.

gwking 23 days ago [–]

I meant does the rare SQLite bug tend to manifest in litestream for the same reason it showed up in Tailscale.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact