Those seem consistent to me. Some pages weren't written to the WAL (yet?), but s... | Hacker News

Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

thayne 23 days ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Tracking down the 16-year-old WAL-reset SQLite bug

Those seem consistent to me. Some pages weren't written to the WAL (yet?), but something else referenced them or otherwise indicated they existed, so then the other process tried to read them, resulting in the issue in the first quote.

inigyou 23 days ago [–]

The explanation says they were written to the WAL and then not written to the main database file.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact