Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not sure how true this restrictions is once you have the agents hammering on at a big code base of formalised proofs.

Proofs stretching thousands of pages are split into lemmas, grouped into sub theories.

What I haven’t seen agents do yet is to develop new ideas for entire such theories. I have usually seen them bite into some existing idea and grinding out related results. But I am less sure than ever that they won’t!



The thread title is "What sort of maths are LLMs good at?"

The codebase you describe would be an external tool in GP's conception.


If I walked outside, I would also be an external tool. So, I don't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: