What was the violation? Just because they interpret something as a violation it doesn't make it true.

The violation is that adblockers were blocking ads in other 3rd party apps. Manipulating other apps is the violation.

This has nothing do with the blocking ads on the web like people are saying. These instead block ads in things like Angry Birds and other apps.

Its probably worth noting that the first response is the following:

"As a developer for Adblock Plus I am looking forward to a resolution to this issue which indeed is a serious problem.

Here are our proposals on how to fix this security hole without compromising Adblock Plus and similar apps: (A) Add an additional permission for apps that want to act as a proxy and/or (B) Add an API to Android that is similar to Gecko's nsIContentPolicy and Chromium's WebRequest (access to this API may require the permission mentioned in (A))"

Might only be a matter of time before Adblock for Chrome is removed from the Webstore though.

The value proposition just isn't there for them to give ad block the boot from desktop chrome. Ad blocking functionality is a major driver of browser adoption. Google is better off with ad blocking extensions and a larger userbase to scrape data from.

I don't think so, there in an equivalent to it on other browser unlike the mobile version. And on mobile there is developer revenue to consider.

Also the way Adblock in implemented on mobile does introduce security risks: http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/02/13/google-has-effective...

Can you run adblock for chrome on android?

Firefox Mobile has adblock. I'd recommend nightly

I recommend Adblock Edge which is available for Firefox mobile.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/

"Adblock Edge is a fork of the Adblock Plus version 2.1.2 extension for blocking advertisements on the web. This fork will provide the same features as Adblock Plus 2.X and higher but without "acceptable ads" feature."

Chrome for Android doesn't do extensions.