> I’m completely behind David Cameron being vehement about keeping children and rape out of pornography, by the way. I don’t think anyone on earth is arguing “pro” for that one.
I'm "pro" both of those. I believe that people that have a liking for these things will seek to satisfy their desires, and I think it's preferable they do it through porn to them doing that in real life. In other words, I would prefer that perverts jerk off using images of kids, not actual kids.
I also see no reason why that kind of porn would not be digitally generated (except for the fact that it's illegal).
Also, due to the online surveillance and the general political atmosphere, I feel uncomfortable posting this using my real account.
Clearly nobody likes to think of perverts masturbating to pictures of children, but so long as no children are harmed to make that possible, who really cares?
I would love to see more studies done on the effects of pornography on violent crime - if we can decrease actual cases of child abuse by allowing, for instance, computer generated pornography of that type, then why not?
I'm "pro" both of those. I believe that people that have a liking for these things will seek to satisfy their desires, and I think it's preferable they do it through porn to them doing that in real life. In other words, I would prefer that perverts jerk off using images of kids, not actual kids.
I also see no reason why that kind of porn would not be digitally generated (except for the fact that it's illegal).
Also, due to the online surveillance and the general political atmosphere, I feel uncomfortable posting this using my real account.