Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your post has no substance, other than to say some people on the mailing list don't like it. But other people on the mailing list do like it. So your post is meaningless and useless.

If you actually have problems with Go's packaging, and care about it enough to write as much as you have, why didn't you simply point out the flaws?



  > So your post is meaningless and useless.
Can I hand you some tissue so that you can get rid of your angry tears? That Go reality distortion field seems to be strong.

  > why didn't you simply point out the flaws?
Because there are already dozens of people who did that already?


> Because there are already dozens of people who did that already?

Do you really expect people to scour a newsgroup to find the meaning of your vague and unsubstantiated claims?

Someone could similarly say "Scala is an unmitigated failure of a language. If you want to know why, just track down its detractors on the Internet. There are dozens." Would you be impressed by that?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: