HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd say the difference is all about time.

Kima is awesome for startups, who need a cash infusion RIGHT NOW. This can often save a startup and make the difference between the startup shutting down and it becoming a billion dollar company.

With YC, it's a very long process as it roughly takes 4 months from applying to money in the bank.

So Kima can give startups a fat cash injection, which is good for startups who know exactly what to do and just need cash, nothing else. YC is more for long-term startup building, getting into a community, relocating, becoming a Silicon Valley startup etc.



"With YC, it's a very long process as it roughly takes 4 months from applying to money in the bank."

That's not true. Startups get the initial $18k + $80k on acceptance.


Let me disagree. Applications are 6 months apart, this makes it for new applicants statistically ~3months + the time until acceptance makes roughly 4months.

Considering that lots of startup founders apply many times before being accepted, the median is easily in the years range.


The median application is submitted about 2 days before the deadline.

It seems misleading to consider multiple applications, since we're talking here about the time between applying and getting money or a no.


Are you referring to the median funded application or the median submitted application?

You had mentioned the day before the deadline applications are submitted at a rate of one per minute, which is bound to bring the median closer to the deadline, but only YC knows how many of the applications submitted during the last 2 days were funded. The median funded application could be submitted 2 months before that for all we know.

If it's the median funded application, shouldn't you be correspondingly alarmed YC-funded startups apply 2 days before the deadline? Would setting more deadlines (having more funding cycles) generate more YC startups?


Ok true, then it would be 1 month application period, 2 weeks for an interview invite, 2 weeks to have the interview, so it would be around 2 months vs. 2 weeks, 4 times longer.

But that's fine, because your expertise is a more long-term approach over several months, Kima's expertise are burst-investments. You have completely taken up the "hatching investments" space, Kima will completely take up the burst-investment space.

I think is the next logical step of startup investments after accelerators. Just as we've now seen accelerators popping up everywhere (and now dying down), we could see Kima-clones popping up everywhere soon.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: