Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What absolute nonsense.

Diminishing the meaning of 'rights' is great: if everyone and everything had appropriate rights, there would be no further need for the concept to be discussed. That's a good thing.



Giving puppies a legal right to have silly hats and birthday parties obviously diminishes the real rights that we all care about. Rights-proliferation leads to governments taking a pick-and-choose approach to enforcement, and many people would argue that having selectively enforced rights is tantamount to not having any rights at all.

See also: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2014/dec/04/-sp-case-against...


OK, I agree that you don't really have "rights" if they are unenforced.

Giving the rights to puppies as you mention doesn't chanage that either way; this is a red herring.

And I suspect it was not the parent commenter's point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: