Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The counter argument to this is that the RFC is exceedingly new, and directly from Apple. Microsoft has been using .local in example (and recommending them for production) AD builds for a decade. I see what Apple is going for, and I don't mind the idea, but the practical results are frustrating and pointless.


No, Microsoft has not been recommending .local, as this document, circa Windows Server 2000, states:

> Identify your organization's DNS owner and determine what registered DNS names you have available on the network that will host Active Directory.

> If you do not have a registered domain name, you should register a name with an Internet DNS registration authority.

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727085.aspx

>


Actually they've said different things about it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local#Microsoft_recommendation...


The approved standard RFC is new but the proposal RFC and the practice of using .local for mDNS, like the convention of using .local for AD, goes back more than a decade. I agree that the whole thing is silly and pointless but it's not clear who "barged in" on whom.


.local doesn't work in Windows either as of Windows 8.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: